tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2038586925862257656.post1305791502231660413..comments2010-11-29T18:03:10.628+01:00Vladimir Rychevnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2038586925862257656.post-84828269355630398912008-02-09T00:33:00.000+01:002008-02-09T00:33:00.000+01:00Yesterday, after rewriting in a hurry a part of code, I tried to say something to our Senior Editor, but I reached success only after a third try, the problem was in a phonemes order in the word which i tried to say... i mixed phonemes up %)2kanhttp://2kan.livejournal.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2038586925862257656.post-23637804020844625582008-02-09T00:31:00.000+01:002008-02-09T00:31:00.000+01:00You should try asking 10 random non-geeks for that antonym. I bet "деконструктор" will come up.Aldanurhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00146165387838602144noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2038586925862257656.post-45686642639153087792008-02-09T00:25:00.000+01:002008-02-09T00:25:00.000+01:00"деконструктор"? I don't know such word and I can not believe that "конструктор" can have more then one common antonym. <BR/>But... hm... I've never used it, I just understand... <BR/>I've never been clever, because need it never... I've wrote 0 bytes of C++ code!!! At al!2kanhttp://2kan.livejournal.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2038586925862257656.post-27289121914541913972008-01-31T09:46:00.000+01:002008-01-31T09:46:00.000+01:00(I was referring to "деконструктор" vs "деструктор")Aldanurhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00146165387838602144noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2038586925862257656.post-34987480286849218082008-01-31T07:41:00.000+01:002008-01-31T07:41:00.000+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.dkorduban.uahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11614201589931439212noreply@blogger.com